Ben Fritz | Ian Andrew Bell https://ianbell.com Ian Bell's opinions are his own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ian Bell Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:30:20 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 https://i0.wp.com/ianbell.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cropped-electron-man.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Ben Fritz | Ian Andrew Bell https://ianbell.com 32 32 28174588 Is VoD Dead? https://ianbell.com/2002/10/21/is-vod-dead/ Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:30:20 +0000 https://ianbell.com/2002/10/21/is-vod-dead/ Intertainer Shuts Down — Whither VOD? VentureReporter.net Friday, October 18, 2002, 7:10 PM ET

by Ben Fritz

Intertainer, the dominant player in the Internet video-on-demand (VOD) space, has shut its doors, most likely for good.

The L.A.-based company raised approximately $125 million in VC money, about twice as much as the infamous DEN. Only a small amount of that is believed to be left.

CEO Jonathan Taplin says Intertainer is no longer able to operate due to alleged price fixing and unfair competition by the major studios that provide its content. Last month, Intertainer filed a lawsuit against AOL Time Warner, Sony, Vivendi Universal, and MovieLink, the online VOD joint venture the three are planning to launch along with MGM and Paramount.

“We came to the conclusion that it would be better to get the business model straight in court so we no longer are faced with negative gross margins,” Taplin told DCR. “Studio demands have gotten much worse over the past year to the point where they’re no longer reasonable. At one point, we had around 1000 movies from every studio except Paramount. Now we have only 50, and with the exception of Dreamworks and MGM, which have been straight up with us, those are provided only due to advances we paid.”

Taplin accused the studios of engaging in unfair practices to undermine Intertainer as soon as they decided to band together to form MovieLink. He singled out Sony, an Intertainer shareholder, accusing the studio of suddenly refusing to provide Intertainer with its content and of using its position on Intertainer’s board to share proprietary information with MovieLink.

None of the studios would comment on the suit, although a Warner Bros. spokeswoman called it “ludicrous.”

Since launching a broadly available VOD service last year, Intertainer has signed 147,000 subscribers, although it’s unknown how many of those signed up for just one month or were regular customers.

The company has said its site will only be down until its lawsuit against the studios is resolved. Even if Intertainer wins, however, the only likely result is that it will recoup some cash for its investors. The chances of studios providing content to a company that has sued them is virtually nil.

With MovieLink still facing an anti-trust investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and waiting to launch, the remaining players in the VOD space are CinemaNow, which offers a small selection of content from major studios along with independent films, and MovieFlix, which has mostly public domain films and an increasing number of independent movies.

Both companies said they are in negotiations with major studios to add their content and, whether out of a desire to stay on Hollywood’s good side or a genuinely different experience than Intertainer claims to have had, said their dealings with the studios have been slow, but fair.

“A year ago, I think the studios were very wary of Internet distribution, but that seems to have slowly changed,” said Curt Marvis, CEO of L.A.-based CinemaNow, which has short-term distribution deals with MGM, Universal and Warner Bros. “All the studios are currently in business with us or are in negotiations and we haven’t seen anything that leads us to feel we can’t run a successful business with them.”

Robert Moskovits, COO of L.A.-headquartered MovieFlix, was harsh in his analysis of Intertainer’s downfall, accusing it of being another dot-com that failed due to too much VC money and optimism about the space’s growth.

“They were shooting for the stars, but this space is just a primordial soup now and there are no stars to be had,” he stated. “Going through over $100 million in this business is just criminal. We’ve done this for half a million of our own money and while we’re much smaller than Intertainer, we’re still around.”

Both CinemaNow and MovieFlix offer monthly subscriptions to view their premium content, priced at $9.95 and $5.95 respectively. CinemaNow also charges $2.99 for downloads of its major studio films, such as “Erin Brockovich” and “Harry Potter.”

Marvis declined to release the number of CinemaNow subscribers, but said there was a “major up tick” in the past two months since CinemaNow began signing major studios. Moskovits said MovieFlix currently has 6300 and projects it will have 10,000 by the end of Q1 2003. MovieFlix, which is run by Moskovits and a partner, is currently cash flow positive, while CinemaNow, which has major investors such as Microsoft and is majority owned by independent studio Lions Gate, is shooting for profitability in the first quarter of 2004.

Both companies expressed optimism that the launch of MovieLink will bring increased attention to the VOD space, increasing their own opportunities as purveyors of more niche content. CinemaNow is also looking to profit from its deals abroad, as MovieLink will only be available in the U.S.

MovieLink has said it will launch by the end of the year, but the DOJ investigation is ongoing and launch dates have been repeatedly delayed over the past two years. Some industry insiders have told DCR they believe MovieLink may never launch due to DOJ anti-trust concerns.

If it does, though, MovieLink will no longer have to face the one competitor that was in a position to be a direct rival. It now remains to the courts and the fate of MovieLink to prove whether Intertainer’s failure was due to illegal behavior by studios, or a space that’s not yet ready for prime time.

———–

]]>
3987
Dr Koop Marches On.. https://ianbell.com/2001/08/22/dr-koop-marches-on/ Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:34:43 +0000 https://ianbell.com/2001/08/22/dr-koop-marches-on/ From Digital Coast Daily: drkoop.com Shifts Its Focus Offline as It Completes iVonyx Acquisition    by Ben Fritz Health information site drkoop.com (OTC BB: KOOP) completed its […]]]> I’m personally offended by the fact that these guys continue to exist in the same (albeit, slightly deflated) bubble that ultimately killed the rest of us… 🙂

-Ian.

——>From Digital Coast Daily:

drkoop.com Shifts Its Focus Offline as It Completes iVonyx Acquisition   

by Ben Fritz

Health information site drkoop.com (OTC BB: KOOP) completed its acquisition of home infusion company iVonyx Group Services yesterday, signaling a major shift in strategy for the Santa Monica-headquartered company.

Last year, as an ad-supported online health content site, drkoop.com lost a whopping $146 million on just $10.6 million in revenue. As CEO Richard Rosenblatt admits, “We discovered that the idea of selling advertising and licensing content just wasn’t a profitable way to run a business.”

Now, with the iVonyx acquisition and an upcoming launch of a line of dietary supplements, drkoop is focusing on extending the brand name of its well-known namesake, former Surgeon General Dr. C. Everett Koop, into offline products supported by marketing on its website. iVonyx will now be known as drkoop Life Care, and the drkoop.com site will not only market the new division, but also provide information on ailments that are treated by its home infusion services, which provide medicine and care to patients at home.

“The drkoop brand is really something we can use across the entire health spectrum, especially for aging baby boomers,” Rosenblatt explains. “By acquiring profitable businesses, we feel like we can take them even further using the drkoop name and our website.”

With the close of the acquisition, G. Peter Molloy, formerly CEO of iVonyx, becomes drkoop.com’s president. Albert Henry, chairman of iVonyx, and Peter Molloy will join drkoop.com’s board of directors.

In order to finance the acquisition, which was made with $2 million in cash and 5 million shares of stock, drkoop recently raised $4.325 million by issuing preferred shares of its stock. It has also entered into a $10 million credit facility with Heller Healthcare Finance for the drkoop Life Care division.

In addition to home infusion, drkoop is also planning to launch a line of dietary supplements using its brand name. These products will also be supported with content and marketing on the drkoop.com site.

“Supplements are a multi-billion dollar market, and we think consumers want real science and a brand name behind them,” Rosenblatt stated. “You can see the same thing with a lot of other consumer health products. There’s no brand behind them, so we figure why not bring in the drkoop brand.”

]]>
3608
Interesting Article for those into Streaming Media https://ianbell.com/2001/07/11/interesting-article-for-those-into-streaming-media/ Thu, 12 Jul 2001 01:08:36 +0000 https://ianbell.com/2001/07/11/interesting-article-for-those-into-streaming-media/ —— Forwarded Message From: “Digital Coast Daily” Date: 11 Jul 2001 21:39:45 -0000 Interview Record Labels, Web, TV, Wireless: ArtistDirect’s New CEO Ted Field Wants to Develop a Multimedia Company

by Ben Fritz

With many of its colleagues in the online music space–like MP3.com and Launch Media–being acquired by larger companies, ArtistDirect <the new world of digital music. COO, President and Co-founder Keith Yokomoto also joined in the conversation.

Let’s start off with the obvious question: At a time when the online world isn’t what’s considered hot in Hollywood, why did you decide to join ArtistDirect?

Ted Field: It was for very specific reasons. I understood that an artist network was valuable as a platform to market artists and music. I believe that of course the Net is in its infancy, a shakeout period has now occurred, and ArtistDirect was going to be — and now is — one of the survivors. And so for me what better way to start a record label than with ArtistDirect funding the label with not just inert money but proactive money that could add tremendous value. As we entered discussions and I learned more about ArtistDirect they talked to me about becoming CEO of the entire company. I got to know Marc [Geiger, co-founder and former CEO and chairman, now vice-chairman and president of artist services] and Keith [Yokomoto] and I thought we would make a great team working together. So I agreed to take the CEO slot.

Do you think the ArtistDirect site and the new label will be intimately connected?

TF: I think they will be. The skills of ArtistDirect in viral marketing, as an agency and some other pieces make it a terrific launching platform for any act. Of course we’ll do traditional promotion and marketing and touring as well. We’re looking at the overall company as a marketing solutions company as well as an Internet company. The model that excited me is a hybrid of offline and online businesses. Then the idea is try to cross-pollinate those businesses in a way that makes sense. We all know a strictly e-commerce model is not effective. That was never intended to be the ArtistDirect model according to Marc and Keith. I endorse that and, in fact, want to make it a bit bigger. I’m big on the idea of branding. That’s why we’re calling the label ArtistDirect Records instead of Radar [the name of Field’s production company].

Is there a lot of pressure for you to make ArtistDirect profitable really fast?

TF: I think the bifurcated answer is that for the online piece of business, since I’ve been here I’ve been extending what Marc and Keith are doing in terms of getting it to break even on its own. I can say that we’re very close to doing that and will have done that on a running basis shortly. The corporate overhead here can then be allocated toward the expansion of the agency and development of the record label.

Marc Geiger, who stepped down as CEO when you joined, is now in charge of the agency, correct?

TF: That’s not correct, entirely. He’s also doing a new heritage record label that will specialize in artists who can’t get a record deal but have household names and big touring bases. The notion is to use the network initially to try to break new records while engaging with them also on the touring side and the marketing solutions side. The heritage platform is something Marc is spending a good deal of time on. We’re about to announce the hiring of a big name music producer who will specialize in producing those albums.

“We’re not competition for the efforts of the labels. We want to be one of the places where consumers can subscribe to music owned by the labels.” -Ted Field

What’s the status of Marc Geiger, in general, now that you have taken over as CEO? What’s your relationship with him like?

TF: One of the key reasons I joined was Marc and Keith’s desire to stay. Had either said they were going to leave I might not have joined. Really it’s a tripartite management team. I consider Keith and Marc my partners. I’m nominally CEO, but without their skills I’d be floundering.

You said you are thinking of ArtistDirect more as a marketing solutions company. What do you mean by that?

TF: We’re already doing marketing for labels and will continue with that. But I mean more. I’m talking about the ability to sell sponsorships across everything we do for various constituents. Our Fan Nation tour, for instance, could be made into a bigger thing and we think there will then be opportunities to present a lot of related options to sponsors. We’re trying a lot of new things with sponsorships, including a deal for a satellite and cable ArtistDirect TV channel.

A TV channel? How would that work?

TF: That would be a TV channel for music using our skills in programming and musicology from the digital music piece. These guys engineered an end-to-end solution for music and one thing I said when joined was let’s just see how much obstruction there is in terms of getting directly to the consumer. We’re developing what I call our music schema, which is a system to navigate digital music that we’re going to be offering consumers hopefully sometime in 2002 if we can get licenses from the labels or join up with MusicNet or Pressplay or both. That’s transferable to an ArtistDirect-branded channel. We’re not going to compete with MTV, but try to provide programming that MTV doesn’t. Then we can say to sponsors that we have an agency to help you, a TV network, a network on the Internet Å  the idea is integration.

Where do you see ArtistDirect fitting into the rapidly developing and consolidating online music space?

TF: We’re not competition for the efforts of the labels. We want to be one of the places where consumers can subscribe to music owned by the labels. All of the label heads have indicated that they are open to licensing across multiple platforms. We do have a proprietary way of navigating by more than just genre. We really can offer musicology that acts as a digital DJ. We think that will be one of our magnets for subscribers. We think another is early ticketing. We can offer subscribers the opportunity to buy concert tickets for their favorite artists early. We think that gives us some special edge. We’re looking for things that will get us subscribers. We don’t have to be first.

Keith Yokomoto: We’ve always been on the sidelines a bit. A lot of folks have overlooked us as a result. But we made a lot of conscious decisions. We could have released a Napster version. But we’re inside the industry and have investments from the labels. We’ve been largely under the radar, developing and showing our services to a few people. But we’ve been in discussions with Pressplay and MusicNet about the evolution of our service. If we got something launched at the end of this year it would be like Yahoo’s carriage deal with MusicNet.

“It seems to me you’ve got to look at this company five years down the road having a successful record label, our heritage label, a digital subscription service, our own TV channel Å  We’re looking at a big, long-term build.” -Ted Field

A lot of other independent music companies, like MP3.com and Launch, have been acquired recently. Do you see ArtistDirect as a likely acquisition target?

TF: I think we’re not an acquisition target. We are in a building phase right now. It seems to me you’ve got to look at this company five years down the road having a successful record label, our heritage label, a digital subscription service, our own TV channel Å  We’re looking at a big, long-term build. Everyone is committed for long term. Of course, we’re a public company and we can’t help it if someone buys our stock. But we’re not in a mode of trying to sell ourselves. We think a lot of what we do is revenue generating. The TV channel will not require one dime from us. The agency is being built largely without cash. The record label should be cash positive very quickly. A lot of things are not intended to burn cash. And we still have a substantial hunk of cash. [At the end of the first quarter of this year, ArtistDirect had over $80 million in cash and short-term investments]

Is entering the wireless space a part of your strategy?

KY: Yes, we’ve been working with AT and other folks on cross-promotion stuff. Nokia is sponsoring Fan Nation. Also, a lot of the things Ted was talking about with the music schema is the ability to program on your own, and for that preference to follow the user whether on a mobile device, a PC, or even a stereo. I think those things have to happen for consumer to feel like they are getting value.

In the long run, do you think CDs and online music will co-exist, or will digital music eventually supplant physical products?

TF: I look at the analogy of people thinking that TV would supplant radio. People always think the next technology will supplant what came before. I think things find their level. Some people want their music hands-on and some people want everything digitized. There’s clearly an increasing utilization of the Net to deliver music. How quickly will it develop? Anyone can throw out crystal ball predictions, but the point is not to be too early but not to be behind. We’ve got to be well positioned with our digital subscription service. And we’re exploring a lot of other kinds of services like narrowcasting channels for artists or music that consumers can’t normally get, or even outtakes from concerts. If someone is a rabid fan they might be willing to pay $2 for that, and we’ve got the capability to provide that.

Do you think ArtistDirect got too caught up in the Internet hype of the last few years?

KY: Anybody with hindsight can say, “We should have spent money on this or that.” My job was to raise money and build capital. We raised $170 million and we had to spend some of that to be competitive with the marketplace Å  you really did have to go do a Yahoo deal to be public. That being said, what we did as soon as we saw some of market turnaround was to start tearing some stuff down. We’ve been doing it in a logical way by getting out of some distribution and marketing deals. But now that we have invested, we have a good service. Our e-commerce system, for instance, now takes only two people to run.

Marc and I founded the agency, a smaller record label, and the online company back in 1996. Then they were each just worth a couple of million dollars. When things became favorable we raised a lot of money. Launch and others didn’t have the insider management team like Marc Geiger, not to mention Ted Field. We’re really uniquely positioned.

TF: Another way of looking at it is if anyone at all believes it was a good thing for the company to get me to join, I wouldn’t have done it without what they have built. That’s what lured me as someone who had other options. We are, though, trying to step back in the sense of trying to rationalize our Internet business to see what can now be used to support our own label, a heritage label, a TV channel, the agency–all of these pieces which we see as integrating well together. But now have to do more than talk about all that. We have to execute.

(c) Rising Tide Studios LLC 1999 – 2001

—— End of Forwarded Message

]]>
3576