Comments on: Still a lot more bottom in Vancouver Real Estate https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/ Ian Bell's opinions are his own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Ian Bell Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:17:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: sacha https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-982 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:17:32 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-982 Some people prefer to buy custom essays using the writing services just about Still a lot more.

]]>
By: Ouchi https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-844 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:28:10 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-844 An IT instructor recently told his class that for a few thousand per month he can hire a topnotch team of 5 IT experts to work for his business out of India (via the internet). He said he would never hire any of his IT students in Vancouver – it just wouldn’t make any financial sense.

This is the crux of the matter. US and Canadian incomes will fall; Asian incomes will rise. In the meantime, there will be more unemployment coming here, and without a doubt downward pressure on incomes… and house prices… and rents.

Many people in Vancouver are in denial because they put all their eggs in to their real estate basket… everyone was saying, you better get in or get left behind.

Let’s remember that a house is a depreciating asset… it rusts, weathers, and falls into disrepair, not to mention falling out of style (and energy-efficiency rating).

Why should a house cost over 8 years of earnings, when it takes less than a year’s labour equivalent and perhaps another year’s worth of material cost to build? And those costs will surely come way down with the end of the construction boom.

]]>
By: James Darcy https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-824 Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:25:21 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-824 “BC’s nice, but it has nothing compared to some areas of California.”

Correct. BC frequently feels like an ersatz California. A much blander, scrubbier, tattier version. It even has its own poor man’s wine region. The Okanagan doesn’t hold a candle to the Napa/Sonoma area.

Don’t get me wrong; I *like* BC. But it is by no means “the greatest place on Earth”. People who think otherwise SERIOUSLY need to get out more.

]]>
By: James Darcy https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-823 Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:22:00 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-823 “Its more desirable than Manhattan or San Fransisco or London for too many reason to site in this post just read the Economist livability index”

Total and utter bollocks.

“Liveability” as defined by The Economist is totally different from the factors that draw large numbers of people to a city. Vancouver is a clean, orderly city with some nice local skiing and hiking, and some horribly boring architecture. It is not “world class” by a long shot: it’s essentially full of mildly affluent rubes. It is a million miles from being any kind of centre of power, money or culture. It’s an easy-going backwater with an over-inflated sense of its own greatness. Try living in some REAL cities (NYC, London, Tokyo, Chicago, Sydney) and you’ll be in doubt as to the difference.

]]>
By: Daniel Gibbons https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-753 Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:55:46 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-753 @Peter Eller Ultimately what determines real estate prices is supply and demand. You can’t possibly argue that we’re not shifting from a market in which supply was relatively tight to one in which there is a glut of inventory. Behind that shift is rising unemployment and mean / median incomes that will probably fall over the next year, and banks who are tightening up the conditions under which they’ll provide credit to consumers. Economics 101 tells you that prices have to fall a lot further than they have to date.

The fact that Vancouver is a desirable place to live will be reflected in the extent to which, even after they fall 15-20%, prices in Vancouver will still be substantially higher than those in less desirable markets where prices are *also* falling.

]]>
By: Jody Dubick https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-743 Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:34:46 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-743 Great post Ian.
I just spent the past weekend in Seattle and met up with a buddy that’s currently living in Seattle, however he’d lived in Vancouver for a number of years. We had an interesting conversation about the cost of living between the 2 cities. Despite Seattle having a much larger base of higher paying jobs (think of the corporations centred in Seattle, Starbucks, Microsoft, Amazon, Boeing, Weyerhauser, and a much more dynamic tech startup scene), Vancouver has a higher cost of living due to astronomical real estate prices and clearly was a bubble.

When real estate bubbles burst prices drop severely, as they’ve done in the US. Speculators leave in droves and homeowners have negative equity – I wouldn’t want to be renegotiating with a bank in the next few years. These 2 factors put severe pressure on prices. Regarding BC’s status as a great place to live artificially inflating house prices, if home prices in California have caved, prices will cave in BC. BC’s nice, but it has nothing compared to some areas of California.

And by the way, the Case-Shiller index, which tracks the price of real estate in 20 US cities, showed that between 1895-1995 housing prices increased by the the inflation rate. There was no capital appreciation in the long term. What’s happened in BC (and the world for that matter) is unsustainable.

]]>
By: mike bowcott https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-741 Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:58:52 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-741 Hi

Read a similar article a few weeks back about a BC Condo developer who was dropping prices 40%. As I read further, I though it sounded like a bottom was being made but then they said teh developer had dropped prices from 390 sq ft to 280 sq ft.

Did not realize your market was this over valued. Still a long way to go on the downside.

]]>
By: Peter Eller https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-735 Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:39:11 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-735 wrong , wrong and wrong

Vancouver has astronomical real estate prices because it is one of the most desirable places to live in the world

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2007/08/23/bc-vancouver.html

its more desirable than Manhattan or San Fransisco or London for too many reason to site in this post just read the Economist livability index

because I don’t think you realize how good you have it

]]>
By: Dan https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-734 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:53:57 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-734 Good points about Vancouver.

“that is if they don’t blow up their penthouse with a meth lab.”

You lost your footing there. You were discussing pot dealers and growers. The meth crowd is a different group.

]]>
By: macchiato https://ianbell.com/2009/01/30/still-a-lot-more-bottom-in-vancouver-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-733 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:27:54 +0000 https://ianbell.com/?p=4438#comment-733 “… world’s list of least affordable cities”

Just a correction, this Demographia study was not for the world, just the main, developed English speaking nations, 6 countries.

“doubt I will ever see another place quite as wonderful as Spanish Banks at low tide in July.”

Wow, don’t get me wrong, I like it a lot, but it doesn’t hold a candle to the better places I’ve seen. It’s imported sand, with muddy low-tide sea bed. Do you also appreciate the up close view of all the tankers loitering in the Bay?

]]>